Explorer Isochrones different from self hosted

Hi all,

Just got the self hosted version of Graphhopper running - awesome tech! To test is out, I compared the foot isochrones I got from the explorer (https://explorer.graphhopper.com/, https://graphhopper.com/api/1/isochrone?key=f2b4cb43-64dd-46f5-94a5-3212fdbbd65e&point=49.21768071042355,-122.96575985754895&buckets=1&time_limit=300&profile=foot) to those I got from the self hosted version with the foot_elevation profile. The attached image shows the rough difference between the two, with the red line indicating the end of the isochrone for self hosted case.

I’ve seen a number of posts regarding differences between the self hosted version based on OSM and what’s being used on explorer.graphhopper.com, specifically for route finding for cars/trucks. I was wondering if anyone knew more about the differences in the case of foot profiles?


This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.