GraphHopper.com | Forum | GitHub | Maps | Blog

Open source map v/s graphhopper map


#1

I I get a lot of diff on open source code and graphhopper map.
This is local host map for car.

This is from graphhopper map for car.

Actually, I am using speed region from http://geojson.io/#map=12/35.8907/14.4506

Another static also here.

https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=35.917694%2C14.357414&point=35.85817%2C14.565811&locale=en-GB&vehicle=car&weighting=fastest&elevation=true&use_miles=false&layer=Omniscale

@karussell Please, can you guide why are different path and different distance?


#2

Why is what? The differences in the route? (please be more descriptive and actually ask a question :slight_smile: !)

If so, then probably because of our improved ETAs and also see the differences between open source vs. our GraphHopper Directions API in the table below here.


#3

hi, i faced this too.
I updated source code and map pbf file today but GraphHopper Directions API ETA is different from open source one yet . what would cause this ? and which one is more accurate ?


closed #4